The Computer Audiophile Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 View full article Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Popular Post firedog Posted August 5 Popular Post Share Posted August 5 There’s definitely something to this. I find that with so much available I don’t absorb new music as well as I used to. Some of this is age related, I think, but not all. As you described, I used to buy an album or CD and listen to it multiple times in a row. I quickly knew it inside and out. Now, there’s so much available all the time and I’m constantly listening to new stuff - but I don’t internalize it the way I used to. Again, I think some of this is age related, as I don’t concentrate as intently as 20 or 30 years ago. But some is definitely just the distraction of having so much available. ….On the other hand, it’s really cool to listen to a song in Roon and then in one click bring up all the 27 recorded cover versions of it and listen to each one and compare…. PYP, Audiophile Neuroscience and The Computer Audiophile 1 2 Main listening (small home office): Main setup: Surge protectors +>Isol-8 Mini sub Axis Power Strip/Protection>QuietPC Low Noise Server>Roon (Audiolense DRC)>Stack Audio Link II>Kii Control>Kii Three BXT (on their own electric circuit) >GIK Room Treatments. Secondary Path: Server with Audiolense RC>RPi4 or analog>Cayin iDAC6 MKII (tube mode) (XLR)>Kii Three BXT Bedroom: SBTouch to Edifer M1380 system. Living Room/Kitchen: Ropieee (RPi3b+ with touchscreen) + Schiit Modi3E to a pair of Morel Hogtalare. All absolute statements about audio are false Link to comment
firedog Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 I just looked in Roon and I have over 4000 albums in my personal collection. Once upon a time, when I got to 300 LPs, I thought that was a pretty substantial amount. It’s definitely more difficult to get to know a collection that’s more than 10 times the size. Main listening (small home office): Main setup: Surge protectors +>Isol-8 Mini sub Axis Power Strip/Protection>QuietPC Low Noise Server>Roon (Audiolense DRC)>Stack Audio Link II>Kii Control>Kii Three BXT (on their own electric circuit) >GIK Room Treatments. Secondary Path: Server with Audiolense RC>RPi4 or analog>Cayin iDAC6 MKII (tube mode) (XLR)>Kii Three BXT Bedroom: SBTouch to Edifer M1380 system. Living Room/Kitchen: Ropieee (RPi3b+ with touchscreen) + Schiit Modi3E to a pair of Morel Hogtalare. All absolute statements about audio are false Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted August 5 Author Share Posted August 5 1 minute ago, firedog said: I just looked in Roon and I have over 4000 albums in my personal collection. Once upon a time, when I got to 300 LPs, I thought that was a pretty substantial amount. It’s definitely more difficult to get to know a collection that’s more than 10 times the size. Agree 100% Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Popular Post taipan254 Posted August 5 Popular Post Share Posted August 5 Quote Not only am I enjoying this music more because I purchase it and it has meaning / worth to me, but I’m also discovering just as much or even more music than when I only streamed from the firehose of free music. Looking over the list of albums I’ve purchased in just this Quadio series, I’ve never listened to 75% of the bands and 99% of the music until I purchased it. In addition, I don’t know the last time I listened to The Doors, prior to getting the newly released Atmos version on Blu-ray. The same goes for many other artist and albums. The quote above resonated with me. I’ve also been consuming music differently lately due to advancements in technology. While you, Chris, are focused on immersive audio, I've been enjoying the developments in upsampling. I've particularly enjoyed listening to DSD source files upsampled by PGGB. Since there are far fewer choices when it comes to acquiring DSD-source music compared to PCM-based music, I've been exploring albums and artists I hadn't listened to before. I've been delving into releases from High Definition Tape Transfers and ripping SACDs to compare those upsampled rips to upsampled CDs. It's been a fun journey, both in terms of listening to new music more intently and enjoying the superior sonic experience brought about by excellent mastering and upsampling. Owning music has never been more rewarding for me. maxijazz and The Computer Audiophile 1 1 Link to comment
Audiophile Neuroscience Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 Yeh, there is bit to unpack here. I recently posted a topic linked to a youtube video regarding why music is getting worse. The video was long and the title clickbait so understandably, there was little interest. The premise of the video was that music is getting worse for a whole lot of interrelated reasons. Of the more controversial points was it was now "too easy" to produce music in your bedroom, auto tune it and assemble a "band" made up of artificial drum kits and the like, and circumvent the whole chain of production, studio and distribution to get your music out to an audience. In some ways it is the most exciting times for talented new artists, in some ways the natural selection process has been defeated with inevitable ramifications. As a side-note, was that while it is easier than past times for solo artists, the incentive or need to form real live bands was gone. Where are the Fleetwood Macs, Beatles, Pearl Jams, Queen, ELOs, Moddy Blues, Breads.....? A quick Google of "most popular rock bands of 2024" is lucky to find a band formed in the last 20 years and many formed last century. One of the valid points made in the linked video was "sweat equity" in owned music. It described exactly what Chris was saying about putting in time, effort and your money to find and buy a single album you hoped was worthy of your 'investment'. You poured over your new 'precious' admiring the cover art and reading liner notes. You gladly made the time to devote to listening to the entire album, over and over. This included dedicated time to sit down and listen, not just have it on while doing something else. You were more likely to get to 'know' the artists, see them in concert, and have their music form part of the "soundtrack of your life" Especially in the days of vinyl and some extent CD's, the album held a place or pride in your collection. That collection said something about you. I remember spending countless hours pouring over CD bins in stores around the world in search for new "gems". My audiophile friend did exactly the same and we would compare our trophy finds at the end of the month. Now it is easier and more efficiently achieved with streaming services but it has lost some of the romance and just perhaps some of that sweat equity value. Another point, also mentioned in the OP, was the value we might place on music that is so readily available that it is almost disposable. For the price of one album in the past you can have a month's subscription to a streaming service touting (approaching) every album ever made. Someone said that a new song is added to Spotify every second!! I use streaming services to find new music and for background music while in my study or doing other things. I have terabytes of downloaded and ripped music which I own. I love the ability to form playlists or listen to whole albums. I am also getting my old Mark Levinson CD Transport repaired, at my wife's request, to put on a CD (we have many hundreds) like we did in 'the old days'. Nostalgia maybe, but then again sometimes old becomes new again. Another way of looking at it is simply we have gained in many ways but lost in some ways Sound Minds Mind Sound Link to comment
Dan Gravell Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 Two levels of difference stand out to me when comparing streaming to what you describe @The Computer Audiophile. First - instigation - how the decision is made to 'acquire' (in which I include listening for the first time) music in the first place. Deciding to acquire music, choosing the music, then clicking the purchase button/handing over your cash is a lot stronger than being passively fed music via another party... whether algorithmically generated or not. I think this is the strongest effect, actually. Second - decision fatigue. Streaming services are oriented around keeping you on the platform - it makes sense for you to dither and move from music to music. To present a catalogue of seemingly infinite size and tempt you with new dopamine hits does help their "engagement" metrics but doesn't help your engagement and contemplation of the music. The music does not become "yours" and you do not build as strong an association with it. I don't think it matters much whether the music you acquire is downloaded or physical, although there's probably some other caveman psychological process that might further alter our relationship with music if we have physically held it. Astiga - stream your collection in native quality. bliss - fully automated music organizer. Read the music library management blog. Link to comment
Popular Post PeterG Posted August 6 Popular Post Share Posted August 6 Maybe I needed to drop $10-20K on a streamer instead of a Blusound Node or laptop, but I found streaming could not match CD for sound quality. To me, this was the most important thing of all Audiophile Neuroscience and WAM 2 Link to comment
Bob Loblaw Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 I came into similar conclusions as you @The Computer Audiophile when I realized I could listen to my favorite artists on vinyl. Goes without saying that I still consider my HiRes Qobuz streams inherently superior to vinyl playback, but I realized long time ago that I was losing interest faster for an album and/or artist since I started streaming, i.e. I would skip to the songs I knew I liked and didn't give the others a chance. Now, if I really care for a certain artist or album, I buy vinyl so I know I'll give it my full attention; In my head a vinyl record is meant to be played till the last note. So when I know I have the dispossession to really listen to music without distraction, I grab a bottle of Red Trolley, put on a Strokes or Lana Del Rey record and listen through my tube headamp. The Computer Audiophile 1 Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted August 6 Author Share Posted August 6 5 minutes ago, Bob Loblaw said: I came into similar conclusions as you @The Computer Audiophile when I realized I could listen to my favorite artists on vinyl. Goes without saying that I still consider my HiRes Qobuz streams inherently superior to vinyl playback, but I realized long time ago that I was losing interest faster for an album and/or artist since I started streaming, i.e. I would skip to the songs I knew I liked and didn't give the others a chance. Now, if I really care for a certain artist or album, I buy vinyl so I know I'll give it my full attention; In my head a vinyl record is meant to be played till the last note. So when I know I have the dispossession to really listen to music without distraction, I grab a bottle of Red Trolley, put on a Strokes or Lana Del Rey record and listen through my tube headamp. I love it Bob. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
DuckToller Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 5 hours ago, PeterG said: Deleted Deleted Link to comment
PYP Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 there are two aspects that are rather unique to streaming, however. One is to alert an audiophile friend about my Qobuz finds (he lives in Europe and I live in the U.S. so this sharing cannot happen physically). We have added quite a few favorite albums by alerting each other and having the ability to listen to a wide selection of albums. He often suggests music I would never otherwise listen to (and vice versa). That is fun even when the music isn't my cup of tea (and vice versa). We have gotten to know the overlap regions as well and now can reliably suggest a new find that will end up in the favorites playlist. His preference is to purchase such favorites, while I remain a renter. The other aspect is listening to the music mentioned in biographies. I get to listen to the music that formed a particular musician. And to listen to their music after having read the context of an album and what critics and listeners thought. This process gives me a much better idea of their development as musicians (and that critics are often wrong). Audiophile Neuroscience 1 Grimm Audio MU2 > Mola Mola Makua > Mola Mola Kaluga > B&W 803 D3 Cables: Kubala-Sosna Power management: Shunyata Room: Vicoustics Ethernet: Network Acoustics Muon Pro “Nature is pleased with simplicity.” Isaac Newton "As neither the enjoyment nor the capacity of producing musical notes are faculties of the least use to man...they must be ranked among the most mysterious with which he is endowed." Charles Darwin - The Descent of Man Link to comment
Bob2803 Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 Purchasing music is fine if you are in the stage of life where you can spend a significant amount of financial resources to do so. I and many others are no longer able to do that. Streaming for me is a lifeline to to the music I love. Sure it is not perfect but for many it opens up a whole new world of music we would otherwise never hear. Audiophile Neuroscience 1 Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted August 7 Author Share Posted August 7 48 minutes ago, Bob2803 said: Purchasing music is fine if you are in the stage of life where you can spend a significant amount of financial resources to do so. I and many others are no longer able to do that. Streaming for me is a lifeline to to the music I love. Sure it is not perfect but for many it opens up a whole new world of music we would otherwise never hear. Hi Bob, that was something I thought about quite a bit while writing this. It’s a very valid point. There are no rights or wrongs here. Whatever makes people happy, is all good with me. I’m happy you’re happy. Bob2803 1 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Bob Loblaw Posted August 7 Share Posted August 7 1 hour ago, Bob2803 said: Purchasing music is fine if you are in the stage of life where you can spend a significant amount of financial resources to do so. I and many others are no longer able to do that. Streaming for me is a lifeline to to the music I love. Sure it is not perfect but for many it opens up a whole new world of music we would otherwise never hear. True. In a way that is what kinda sucks about physical media. At least for me, the OCD kicks in if I'm missing one album from an artist I like. Digital, specially with something like Roon, is very easy to categorize, even if one is just streaming. Link to comment
Audiophile Neuroscience Posted August 7 Share Posted August 7 8 hours ago, PYP said: One is to alert an audiophile friend about my Qobuz finds (he lives in Europe and I live in the U.S. so this sharing cannot happen physically). We have added quite a few favorite albums by alerting each other and having the ability to listen to a wide selection of albums. He often suggests music I would never otherwise listen to (and vice versa). That is fun even when the music isn't my cup of tea (and vice versa). We have gotten to know the overlap regions as well and now can reliably suggest a new find that will end up in the favorites playlist. His preference is to purchase such favorites, while I remain a renter. many moons ago I also had such a friend Peter and also SandyK (sadly, both passed) We did the same thing finding and swapping gem musical finds to add to our collection. I think this music seeking for new music is sometimes an underrated aspect of our music reward and receptiveness system. Scales of our music receptiveness like the BMRQ Barcelona Music Reward Questionnaire (BMRQ), show the musical reward experience can be decomposed into five reliable factors: Musical Seeking, Emotion Evocation, Mood Regulation, Social Reward, and Sensory-Motor. PYP 1 Sound Minds Mind Sound Link to comment
Audiophile Neuroscience Posted August 7 Share Posted August 7 6 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said: Whatever makes people happy, is all good with me. I’m happy you’re happy. Clap along if you know what happiness is to you... It's just one thing... Sound Minds Mind Sound Link to comment
PYP Posted August 7 Share Posted August 7 8 hours ago, Audiophile Neuroscience said: Scales of our music receptiveness like the BMRQ Barcelona Music Reward Questionnaire (BMRQ), show the musical reward experience can be decomposed into five reliable factors: Musical Seeking, Emotion Evocation, Mood Regulation, Social Reward, and Sensory-Motor. Had never heard of this questionnaire, but it is interesting. Perhaps we are all assessing all of these factors at some point, subconsciously or not. It seems to me that the rent vs. buy decision is separate from these factors. Grimm Audio MU2 > Mola Mola Makua > Mola Mola Kaluga > B&W 803 D3 Cables: Kubala-Sosna Power management: Shunyata Room: Vicoustics Ethernet: Network Acoustics Muon Pro “Nature is pleased with simplicity.” Isaac Newton "As neither the enjoyment nor the capacity of producing musical notes are faculties of the least use to man...they must be ranked among the most mysterious with which he is endowed." Charles Darwin - The Descent of Man Link to comment
Rt66indierock Posted August 7 Share Posted August 7 Sounds like fun please keep reporting on this. Link to comment
Audiophile Neuroscience Posted August 7 Share Posted August 7 7 hours ago, PYP said: 16 hours ago, Audiophile Neuroscience said: Musical Seeking, Emotion Evocation, Mood Regulation, Social Reward, and Sensory-Motor. Had never heard of this questionnaire, but it is interesting. Perhaps we are all assessing all of these factors at some point, subconsciously or not. It seems to me that the rent vs. buy decision is separate from these factors. I would say Rent vs Buy Music impacts the way we seek music and, in relation to this thread, influencing how we treasure or value it PYP 1 Sound Minds Mind Sound Link to comment
TubeLover Posted August 8 Share Posted August 8 Chris, nice job explaining the conundrum of the vast, almost unlimited world of music available through streaming and what gets lost, ultimately, versus having a new cd, blu-ray, etc. just delivered and really focusing on the music it offers. Perfect example with that Bread disc you have been listening to. What I find really sad are the pronouncements from industry sources, audio related magazines, etc., especially of late, saying that the pressing and availability of CD's will likely come to a complete end, possibly as soon as the first quarter of next year, or shortly thereafter. There does seem to be some hope, for music continuing to be available on BluRay, as it is apparently selling reasonably well, but lets be honest, the numbers of those releases are quite small. When the time comes that I cannot even order a cd of a new release, it will be truly unfortunate, and more will be lost than is realized. JC The Computer Audiophile 1 Link to comment
Popular Post sdolezalek Posted August 8 Popular Post Share Posted August 8 Chris: You are absolutely onto something, but I think it is far broader than music. I can say the same thing about the amount of "great" photographs now available on the web for free, or the 1000 channels of "free" television that my cable and satellite companies offer me, or the unlimited news feeds. Across most of these I would offer the following: 1) It is so easy to produce something "good enough" that the value of good enough content is both nearly zero and less useful; 2) It is both much more work to produce really great content and it is not clear you get paid for the additional work (so fewer artists do it); 3) The sheer volume of what gets produced means that the occasional "accident" can briefly rise to the top (like the recent picture of the flying Olympic surfer - one hit wonders) 4) As the audience, we now have three choices: a) let someone else (i.e. Spotify, Tidal) curate what we should hear for us (often leaving off some true gems) or allow some news channel decide what we should hear b) try to find the energy and time to go through all the content and make intelligent choices as to what we really love (or is true) c) just arbitrarily limit ourselves and realize that we can actually be really happy with a more limited selection (particularly when we put something of ourselves into it, i.e. paid for it); or d) and this is where Audiophilestyle comes in for me: rely on some trusted friends to point you at content they took the time to find and like and share that finding with you... Thank you! Audiophile Neuroscience and The Computer Audiophile 2 Synology NAS>i7-6700/32GB/NVIDIA QUADRO P4000 Win10>Qobuz+Tidal>Roon>HQPlayer>DSD512> Fiber Switch>Ultrarendu (NAA)>Holo Audio May KTE DAC> Bryston SP3 pre>Levinson No. 432 amps>Magnepan (MG20.1x2, CCR and MMC2x6) Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted August 8 Author Share Posted August 8 11 minutes ago, sdolezalek said: Chris: You are absolutely onto something, but I think it is far broader than music. I can say the same thing about the amount of "great" photographs now available on the web for free, or the 1000 channels of "free" television that my cable and satellite companies offer me, or the unlimited news feeds. Across most of these I would offer the following: 1) It is so easy to produce something "good enough" that the value of good enough content is both nearly zero and less useful; 2) It is both much more work to produce really great content and it is not clear you get paid for the additional work (so fewer artists do it); 3) The sheer volume of what gets produced means that the occasional "accident" can briefly rise to the top (like the recent picture of the flying Olympic surfer - one hit wonders) 4) As the audience, we now have three choices: a) let someone else (i.e. Spotify, Tidal) curate what we should hear for us (often leaving off some true gems) or allow some news channel decide what we should hear b) try to find the energy and time to go through all the content and make intelligent choices as to what we really love (or is true) c) just arbitrarily limit ourselves and realize that we can actually be really happy with a more limited selection (particularly when we put something of ourselves into it, i.e. paid for it); or d) and this is where Audiophilestyle comes in for me: rely on some trusted friends to point you at content they took the time to find and like and share that finding with you... Thank you! Very well said. I agree 100% Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Popular Post JoeWhip Posted August 9 Popular Post Share Posted August 9 I agree also. I have plenty of music and am very selective in what I buy. I could play my entire hard drive of ripped and downloaded music 24/7 and it would take many many months to go through it all. The only streaming I do is Apple music for the Atmos and to play in the car. How much is enough? Only you can decide for yourself. Audiophile Neuroscience and maxijazz 1 1 Link to comment
WAM Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 I have always bought the music I liked. Since a few years, I have a Qobuz subscription, but I still buy music, being it CD (PeterG, I am with you), or files. Streaming gives you so much music, that you forget to listen, you are just browsing (nothing wrong with streaming, I like it, but the ritual of saving money for the (f.cking XXX) expensive black disk, buying the LP and sharing it whit your friends is lost). As always, feel free to disagree, and let's keep sharing good music. Happy listening! Audiophile Neuroscience 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now