Jump to content
IGNORED

Apple’s Proposed Changes Reject the Goals of the DMA (Spotify for the Record)


Recommended Posts

Much uglier as the US is also looking I to Apple. They lost a patent dispute with the largest medical device company.

Current:  Daphile on an AMD A10-9500 with 16 GB RAM

DAC - TEAC UD-501 DAC 

Pre-amp - Rotel RC-1590

Amplification - Benchmark AHB2 amplifier

Speakers - Revel M126Be with 2 REL 7/ti subwoofers

Cables - Tara Labs RSC Reference and Blue Jean Cable Balanced Interconnects

Link to comment
12 minutes ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

And, Spotify only pays authors if the entire book is streamed. Unless your a huge publisher who negotiated a better deal. 

If Apple wants to do business in the EU, laws are laws. Should Apple be treated special because it is a monster company?

 

Not defending one way or the other.  Just asking...

Current:  Daphile on an AMD A10-9500 with 16 GB RAM

DAC - TEAC UD-501 DAC 

Pre-amp - Rotel RC-1590

Amplification - Benchmark AHB2 amplifier

Speakers - Revel M126Be with 2 REL 7/ti subwoofers

Cables - Tara Labs RSC Reference and Blue Jean Cable Balanced Interconnects

Link to comment
27 minutes ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

Huh?

 The article is how Apple is still flouting the EU regs on how the charge app developers and that is what I was commenting on.

Current:  Daphile on an AMD A10-9500 with 16 GB RAM

DAC - TEAC UD-501 DAC 

Pre-amp - Rotel RC-1590

Amplification - Benchmark AHB2 amplifier

Speakers - Revel M126Be with 2 REL 7/ti subwoofers

Cables - Tara Labs RSC Reference and Blue Jean Cable Balanced Interconnects

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...