Popular Post Jud Posted December 9, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2023 https://www.cbc.ca/music/the-environmental-impact-of-music-streaming-explained-1.6843948 It appears the cumulative environmental impact of streaming music can be significant. But replaying a downloaded/owned file reduces that impact by 80%. DuckToller, The Computer Audiophile and Audiophile Neuroscience 1 2 One never knows, do one? - Fats Waller The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. - Einstein Computer, Audirvana -> optical Ethernet to Fitlet3 -> Fibbr Alpha Optical USB -> iFi NEO iDSD DAC -> Apollon Audio 1ET400A Mini (Purifi based) -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 Hmm. I’m not a climate change skeptic by any definition, but this one is making my spidy sense tingle. a few news articles linked to a blog article linked to the original data (possibly) here - https://mediaenviron.org/article/17242-streaming-media-s-environmental-impact I’d absolutely love to know the truth on this one, so I’m going to dig a bit. What I see so far seems to stretch the narrative really far. Jud 1 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 This recommendation kind of makes me chuckle. “Resist the temptation of immediacy. I love to watch films on MUBI. However, many of them are available at the video store or the public library, if I’m willing to wait a couple of days.” I’m unsure if we all return to driving to the video store or library (the inter-library driving to bring videos to the local branch too) and all the movies are delivered to the video stores like the 1990s, that the carbon footprint would be better than streaming. It’s really hard to quantify the environmental cost of streaming. Undersea cables, boats, fiber, hard drives, servers, support workers, etc… and using a fraction to split off the other uses of these items, etc… it’s really hard. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Popular Post DuckToller Posted December 9, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2023 59 minutes ago, Jud said: https://www.cbc.ca/music/the-environmental-impact-of-music-streaming-explained-1.6843948 It appears the cumulative environmental impact of streaming music can be significant. But replaying a downloaded/owned file reduces that impact by 80%. I play mainly offline sources a home, streaming is for checking out and for the car, however even there I prefer download to my SD card and thus local play. I may have bought more music from Qobuz than I've streamed this year ... ;-) Jud and Audiophile Neuroscience 2 Link to comment
Popular Post DuckToller Posted December 9, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2023 1 minute ago, The Computer Audiophile said: This recommendation kind of makes me chuckle. “Resist the temptation of immediacy. I love to watch films on MUBI. However, many of them are available at the video store or the public library, if I’m willing to wait a couple of days.” I’m unsure if we all return to driving to the video store or library (the inter-library driving to bring videos to the local branch too) and all the movies are delivered to the video stores like the 1990s, that the carbon footprint would be better than streaming. It’s really hard to quantify the environmental cost of streaming. Undersea cables, boats, fiber, hard drives, servers, support workers, etc… and using a fraction to split off the other uses of these items, etc… it’s really hard. don't we go by bycycle to the local library ? ;-p The Computer Audiophile and Jud 2 Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 21 minutes ago, DuckToller said: don't we go by bycycle to the local library ? ;-p Not when it’s a a mile away and it’s below 0° F with a couple feet of snow on the ground 🙂 Jud 1 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
DuckToller Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 Just now, The Computer Audiophile said: Not when it’s a a mile away and it’s below 0° F with a couple feet of snow on the ground 🙂 come on ... Link to comment
Popular Post AudioDoctor Posted December 9, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2023 9 minutes ago, The Computer Audiophile said: Not when it’s a a mile away and it’s below 0° F with a couple feet of snow on the ground 🙂 I'm going to take your MN Resident card away if I see more of this. ;-) DuckToller, The Computer Audiophile and Jud 3 No electron left behind. Link to comment
Popular Post The Computer Audiophile Posted December 9, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2023 17 minutes ago, AudioDoctor said: I'm going to take your MN Resident card away if I see more of this. ;-) Does that mean I can move somewhere warm? Jud, DuckToller and AudioDoctor 1 2 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Popular Post AudioDoctor Posted December 9, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2023 1 minute ago, The Computer Audiophile said: Does that mean I can move somewhere warm? No, you go to Ely for re-education. The Computer Audiophile and Jud 2 No electron left behind. Link to comment
Popular Post DuckToller Posted December 9, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2023 don't you 1 minute ago, The Computer Audiophile said: Does that mean I can move somewhere warm? Don't you have a 7.1.4 system to keep you warm and well fed with immersive music? fas42 and The Computer Audiophile 1 1 Link to comment
ssh Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 39 minutes ago, The Computer Audiophile said: Not when it’s a a mile away and it’s below 0° F with a couple feet of snow on the ground 🙂 ...you gotta get to Longfellow/Seward more often! SSH Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 3 minutes ago, ssh said: ...you gotta get to Longfellow/Seward more often! Used to live in Prospect Park, by the witches hat tower. Loved it! Went across the bridge to Seward Coop often. ssh 1 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Popular Post AudioDoctor Posted December 9, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2023 As I sit on my heated seat, drinking my hot coffee, in my warm vehicle, I always wonder what the heck those bicycle riding people are thinking as they ride by in a snowstorm. Jud, ssh and Audiophile Neuroscience 1 1 1 No electron left behind. Link to comment
DuckToller Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 6 minutes ago, AudioDoctor said: As I sit on my heated seat, drinking my hot coffee, in my warm vehicle, I always wonder what the heck those bicycle riding people are thinking as they ride by in a snowstorm. ".. snowflakes ... " Priaptor 1 Link to comment
AudioDoctor Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 19 minutes ago, DuckToller said: ".. snowflakes ... " I have become soft in my old age... No electron left behind. Link to comment
Jud Posted December 9, 2023 Author Share Posted December 9, 2023 3 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said: Hmm. I’m not a climate change skeptic by any definition, but this one is making my spidy sense tingle. a few news articles linked to a blog article linked to the original data (possibly) here - https://mediaenviron.org/article/17242-streaming-media-s-environmental-impact I’d absolutely love to know the truth on this one, so I’m going to dig a bit. What I see so far seems to stretch the narrative really far. I'm happier looking at the math used by the people paying the electric bills, Spotify in this case (this is from a Rolling Stone article referenced at the link in the original post): Quote On the listener’s device, streaming uses double the amount of battery life as playing a song that’s been downloaded. On the DSP side, streaming a song activates the servers where the songs live on the cloud. These servers require power, massive cooling systems, internet connectivity, buildings, and land. Spotify’s 2020 Sustainability Report explains that these carbon intensive activities produce over 70,000 tons per year of CO2 — carbon dioxide, the most prevalent greenhouse gas. The report notes that “the second largest source of emissions is the user phase,” meaning you, the listener, “making up 42 % of our emissions.” That’s another 70,000 tons or so of CO2. However, the listener emissions come mostly from streamers, not downloaders. If all songs were downloaded instead of streamed, there would be an 80% reduction in CO2 emissions after the first listen. In other words, nearly all of the carbon intensive activities would be mitigated after the initial download (approximately 70,000 tons eliminated). Plus, listening to downloaded songs uses half of the battery life as streaming them (an additional 47,000 tons eliminated). The math here is not perfect as it can’t take into account server emissions associated with downloads as separate from streams, but the basic concept holds up. Let’s look at an example: “Bang!” by my band AJR, has more than 265 million streams on Spotify. If all of the plays were streamed from the cloud, “Bang!” would have generated at least 3 ⅓ tons of greenhouse gas. This is the same as driving a car from New York to L.A. three times over. If all of the plays were downloads, “Bang!” would have generated less than ⅔ of a ton. [Emphasis added.] I think there are two takeaways here, both reasonably common sense: There's a small amount of electricity usage in each individual case, but when a lot of people stream it eventually adds up to something significant. The less you make the "cloud" do the work, and the more you shift that work to your home systems that are less resource intensive, the less electricity you'll use. I don't personally need tremendous precision about exactly how much less electricity I use, just general guidance about what is the better way to go. The Computer Audiophile 1 One never knows, do one? - Fats Waller The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. - Einstein Computer, Audirvana -> optical Ethernet to Fitlet3 -> Fibbr Alpha Optical USB -> iFi NEO iDSD DAC -> Apollon Audio 1ET400A Mini (Purifi based) -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. Link to comment
Audiophile Neuroscience Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 1 hour ago, AudioDoctor said: I have become soft in my old age... that can happen with old age 🙄 Priaptor 1 Sound Minds Mind Sound Link to comment
Audiophile Neuroscience Posted December 9, 2023 Share Posted December 9, 2023 7 minutes ago, Jud said: I'm happier looking at the math used by the people paying the electric bills, Spotify in this case (this is from a Rolling Stone article referenced at the link in the original post): [Emphasis added.] I think there are two takeaways here, both reasonably common sense: There's a small amount of electricity usage in each individual case, but when a lot of people stream it eventually adds up to something significant. The less you make the "cloud" do the work, and the more you shift that work to your home systems that are less resource intensive, the less electricity you'll use. I don't personally need tremendous precision about exactly how much less electricity I use, just general guidance about what is the better way to go. Jud, is environmental impact a critical factor in your decision whether to stream or play local files ? I much prefer playing local files but I confess it has little to do with environmental impact considerations. Perhaps it should. My Mephisto amplifier probably sucks a lot of energy, so my bad once again. Then again, I produce up to 100kW of solar electricity per day Sound Minds Mind Sound Link to comment
AudioDoctor Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 1 hour ago, Audiophile Neuroscience said: that can happen with old age 🙄 Why the eye roll? No electron left behind. Link to comment
Audiophile Neuroscience Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 2 hours ago, AudioDoctor said: Why the eye roll? a playful way to highlight double entendre 🙂 Sound Minds Mind Sound Link to comment
Jud Posted December 10, 2023 Author Share Posted December 10, 2023 5 hours ago, Audiophile Neuroscience said: Jud, is environmental impact a critical factor in your decision whether to stream or play local files ? Nope. 🙂 It just happens to coincide with a liking for purchasing the recordings I want to listen to most. 5 hours ago, Audiophile Neuroscience said: I much prefer playing local files but I confess it has little to do with environmental impact considerations. Perhaps it should. My Mephisto amplifier probably sucks a lot of energy, so my bad once again. Then again, I produce up to 100kW of solar electricity per day I’m very happy with my Class D amp’s sound, which is by far the main criterion, and also pleased it’s only about 15 pounds (lighter than the transformer alone in my last amp), and that it uses quite a bit less electricity and throws off less heat than my previous amp, a heavy, solid Class A piece. Our solar array is smallish (3.75kW, 11 panels), and was so well sized by the installation company that it has made just a few tenths of a percent above 100% of our electrical usage in the years we’ve lived here. Audiophile Neuroscience 1 One never knows, do one? - Fats Waller The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. - Einstein Computer, Audirvana -> optical Ethernet to Fitlet3 -> Fibbr Alpha Optical USB -> iFi NEO iDSD DAC -> Apollon Audio 1ET400A Mini (Purifi based) -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. Link to comment
Audiophile Neuroscience Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 3 hours ago, Jud said: I’m very happy with my Class D amp’s sound, which is by far the main criterion, and also pleased it’s only about 15 pounds (lighter than the transformer alone in my last amp), and that it uses quite a bit less electricity and throws off less heat than my previous amp, a heavy, solid Class A piece. The Mephisto at 240 pounds is not light weight but its soo toasty warm in winter saving us power bills (lets not talk about summer) It sounds organically warm too but absolutely accurate. I say this with absolutely no bias whatsoever 😊 Jud 1 Sound Minds Mind Sound Link to comment
JoeWhip Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 With many folks buying vinyl, perhaps one day the youngins will also feel it is cool to drive to the store to rent VHS tapes for that “analog” experience too! 😎 AudioDoctor 1 Link to comment
Priaptor Posted December 10, 2023 Share Posted December 10, 2023 15 hours ago, Audiophile Neuroscience said: that can happen with old age 🙄 That is what Viagra is for, no?? Audiophile Neuroscience 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now