seeteeyou Posted July 19 Share Posted July 19 Every single non-Atmos release of this particular album turned out to be such a joke, what a shame and a half https://magicvinyldigital.net/2024/01/27/norah-jones-visions-first-single-running-2024-review-test-tidal-max-flac-amazon-dolby-atmos/ Quote For this review, you will find 2 versions tested: Tidal MAX Flac and Amazon Dolby Atmos. The waveform of Tidal Max Flac clearly shows the use of a dynamic limiter, as confirmed by the dynamic range measurement with a DR5, compared to the Dolby Atmos 2.0 version with a DR14. https://magicvinyldigital.net/2024/03/16/norah-jones-visions-album-review-test-tidal-max-flac-amazon-dolby-atmos-vinyl-record-color-vinyl-record-japanese-sacd/ Tidal Max Flac – 2024 Amazon Dolby Atmos – 2024 Vinyl – 2024 Color Vinyl – 2024 SACD – 2024 Global DR7 DR14 DR9 DR9 DR7 Min DR6 DR10 DR8 DR8 DR6 Max DR10 DR18 DR11 DR11 DR11 For those of us with 2-channel or headphone rigs, the only "acceptable solution" for a similar situation like this should be ripping the lossy Atmos version somewhere. After that, we're gonna get things done with Dolby Reference Player and Music Media Helper. No decent lossless releases at the moment, while they might not consider releasing the TrueHD Atmos version anywhere else. Link to comment
Arindal Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 On 7/19/2024 at 8:55 AM, seeteeyou said: The waveform of Tidal Max Flac clearly shows the use of a dynamic limiter, as confirmed by the dynamic range measurement with a DR5, compared to the Dolby Atmos 2.0 version with a DR14. I do not see anything worrying from recording or mastering perspective in these waveform graphs. A limiter has been used to limit some dynamic spikes in order to achieve a higher average level but there is no sign for applying audible compression which would be associated with a loudness war. There is no sense in comparing 2.0 or Atmos waveforms or DR calculations. It does not say anything about perceived dynamics as Atmos can potentially contain much more reverb on various channels which technically reduces or increases dynamic range but does not sound compressed or limited. I find it amazing how people stare at these graphs and DR calculations as if the sound of a mastering version can be judged by a single number. It cannot. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now